How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
Blog Article
Your session is going to timeout as a result of inactivity. Click on OK to extend your time and efforts for an extra 0 minutes.
H4831 will get the job done inside the Swift but not true very well. You can expect to never ever get the pressures you may need for regularity With all the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be superior but for many rationale I ain't the most significant lover of most ball powders.
The truth that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is precisely why you are observing bigger velocities received with that powder, versus Whatever you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff. Also excellent powder, but somewhat far better suited to a little lesser cases using a bit considerably less capability.
Run your load up with the specific powder (sc or typical) and great deal you are applying however. Identical burn level does not imply it can behave "exactly" precisely the same. I've viewed above 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp many H4831.
The only big difference as I know it is that the SC was built to get the job done by powder steps much better (which it does). The extended grains tend not to feed nicely in any way in certain steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Apache Jct Great details, I have jars of each and always wondered if they may be reloaded with the very same recipes should really I run out of one or one other.
i've employed equally and utilised the exact same rates and possess not been ready to convey to any noticable differences with overall performance. the SC version meters a little smoother is about all. any opinions??
Like said above, very same things. All that is different is the scale with the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I don't know if that is genuine or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC simply because that is what I located in the eight lb h4831sc load data jug and it works.
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. Right after months, I bought lucky and caught some H1000 on the net and of course paid out a little bit added. The incredibly subsequent week in a gun show a guy had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I fail to remember how much, but While using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle load.
locutus stated: I even now have a fantastic stockpile of h4831sc H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows by means of my powder actions efficiently.
As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the identical/similar powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.
Just after looking at this text (and plenty of Other individuals, but h4831sc load data this 1 is easily the most data driven with numerous accredited shooters) I have stopped worrying about touching or being in just a magical distance within the lands, and commenced loading where I could enhance numerous components of a load. Just my .02, ideally you can find anything to work for ya.
I do know the H4831SC gives a far better load density But I believe I've adequate room in my scenario for the normal H4831.
This looks as if a great location to disclose a little more data on Hodgdon, H4831 specially...I as soon as had a pound of H4831SC sit to the shelf for a number of several years. It had been procured prior to Hodgdon started publicizing the "Serious" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.