How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
How h4831 vs h4831sc can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
Blog Article
What's Everybody obtaining excellent accuracy with for 180gr tablets and 4831? Just on the lookout for a place to begin so I do not waste a lot of elements. Many thanks for the assistance!
These are the same issue, but H4831 sc is Slice shorter so it's going to pack into a circumstance simpler then the conventional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it will allow us to add far more powder then just the normal H4831.
WARNING: This product can expose you to guide, which is understood to the State of California to result in cancer and beginning defects or other reproductive hurt. To learn more drop by – .
With the 154 grain Hornady SP from the 280, H4831 gave me great teams and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 provides a appreciably greater velocity and provides marginally superior accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave superb precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. As a result, in each of such situations I went with One more powder, but I would certainly despise to divest myself of the H4831.
The sole big difference as I know it would be that the SC was designed to function through powder measures improved (which it does). The for a longer period grains will not feed well in the least in a few steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Because there isn't going to seem like any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can several of you present a place to begin with this mixture and items to consider when Performing this Load up?
i've made use of the two and employed the exact same charges and also have not h4831sc been capable of convey to any noticable variations with general performance. the SC Model meters just a little smoother is about all. any opinions??
and you might want to spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does modify over the years. 4831 powder of decades back isn't really identical as what exactly is currently available. that is certainly why an individual seriously interested in reloading securely may have probably the most latest load data guides to seek advice from.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Immediately after months, I got Blessed and caught some H1000 on the internet and of course compensated somewhat further. The very up coming 7 days at a gun display a guy had a complete circumstance of H1000 for $forty for every 1lb. I overlook the amount, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.
Additionally, it goes on to say that due h4831sc to fshorter grains, that load density could possibly be marginally larger.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're fully diverse powders, with IMR 4831 becoming considerably a lot quicker as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Really don't treat them as a similar powder, since they most undoubtedly are usually not.
The "SC" means Small Slice. I have not discovered a difference between either powder dut I don't think I'd h4831sc load data personally blend them.
arkansas or ohio i under no circumstances discovered a big difference apart from the typical is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan.
I found that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with small to min rates. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it was a low 60s grain demand within a Norma case. Not what I used to be trying to find, but correct Even so.